Carossa: better trained teachers or Po? still smarting for the victory of the barbarians in Piedmont, I agree with two statements in response to the recent "intervention" of the League's regional neoconsigliere Carossa on lists of teachers: first, Paola Pozzi, Head of School and College Departmental PD Piedmont, according to Stefano Lepri, Regional Councillor PD newly re-elected.
school on a more useful approach that enhances the teachers in the skills and not to the Declaration of residence
Paola Pozzi, Head of School and Departmental Piedmont PD
University Press Law's statements neoconsigliere Carossa about his intention and his party to change the criteria for the rankings of teachers introducing a factor of positive discrimination (most points) for residents in Piedmont. I wonder and ask: 1) since the Region is responsible in setting the criteria for the ranking of teachers, state employees?
2) these are the intentions of Carossa and the League when they talk about federalism? They want a really self-sufficient even in the Piedmont operation of a sensitive and important as the school?
3) Carossa does not believe that for a common good and valuable as the school would benefit from a more thoughtful approach, careful exploitation of teachers, their qualifications rather than their residence? O believes that the latter is to determine the capabilities and skills they need schools and students?
Paola WELLS
Departmental Head Area School and University PD Piedmont.
*********************************************** *************************************
Declaration Stefano Lepri
Carossa Mario has stagnated at electioneering. Now that he was elected to the legislature to let the slogan and the sword. Making laws is a serious matter and we should talk about it before at least know them. Fact:
Carossa says in the rankings for classroom use should be guaranteed a higher score than those who live in our region for some years. Perhaps it is not aware of the fact that for now, federalism, respect for the organization of the school system does not exist. The rankings are made for teaching criteria on a national basis. To do what is necessary to amend proposed laws of the State. The Northern League has ruled in Rome seven of the last nine years. They have an overwhelming majority vote and can make what they want. Cota was previously leader of the Northern League. But on the subject have not done anything.
Carossa also says, for public housing increased the limit of time of residence in Piedmont necessary to make the request. Twelve months are just too few. So do not know for sure that the new regional law 3 \\ 2010 "rules of social housing" provides (article 3 paragraph 1) that the first requirement to achieve an accommodation of the allocation of social housing is "a resident or provide employment for at least three years in the municipality that issues the notice or in one of the municipalities in the same geographical area. " So the center has already passed a federal law that protects those (who are Piedmont, Lombardy, Swiss or non-EU does not matter) a permanent resident or working certainly in that community for at least three years. Someone please tell.
Carossa insists: we want to introduce for public housing and ensure the principle of the favor of the more traditional family, formed by a man and a woman. So ignore that in the Law 3 or no more than two years before. How to say already.
Carossa Finally, I do not pay, we must ensure social cooperatives and artisans that put people at a disadvantage to be working on construction sites and supplies that depend on the government of Piedmont. Carossa should at least know a regulation of the City of Turin, which expressly reserves a certain percentage of the work and supplies to businesses, and non-profit, they undertake to include those committed in a significant percentage of disadvantaged workers. The same model was adopted by the Region of Piedmont in the Budget Law of 2008 has provided that the Regional Directorates and Regional Health Authorities should allocate a share at least 1, 5% of the value of credit for the purchase of goods or services with procedures to ensure the employment of disadvantaged people.
As for the usual care: the company wins best, that is, one that ensures the best value for money. How come all the European rules, not those of the Po Valley.
If good day starts in the morning need to be worried. The time of propaganda is over. Let's be serious.
Stefano Lepri
Turin, April 14, 2010
Massimo
] 
